%0 Journal Article
%K probiotic
%K natural humic substances
%K performance
%K serum biochemistry
%K 
metabolic activity of phagocytes
%K lymphoproliferation
%K broiler chickens
%B Berliner und Münchener Tierärztliche Wochenschrift
%C Hannover
%D 2009
%G English
%I Schlütersche Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG
%P 370-377
%R 10.2376/0005-9366-122-370
%T The effect of the probiotic strain Enterococcus faecium DSM 7134 in combination with natural humic substances on performance and health of broiler chickens
%V 122
%1 {"oldId":69158,"title":"The effect of the probiotic strain Enterococcus faecium DSM 7134 in combination with natural humic substances on performance and health of broiler chickens","teaserText":"The present study investigated the effect of the probiotic strain  Enterococcusfaecium  DSM 7134 (2 x 10 7  cfu per g of feed) (probiotic group), natural humic substances(7g.kg -1  feed) (HS group), and the combination of both (probiotic ...","content":"<p><span class=\"bold\">Summary<\/span><br \/>\r\n\r\n\r\nThe present study investigated the effect of the probiotic strain<span class=\"bold\"> Enterococcus\r\nfaecium<\/span> DSM 7134 (2 x 107<\/span> cfu per g of feed) (probiotic group), natural humic substances\r\n(7g.kg-1<\/span> feed) (HS group), and the combination of both (probiotic +\r\nHS group) on the performance, serum biochemistry, and biological activity of leucocytes\r\nof broiler chickens. Average body weight of chickens in different phases as\r\nwell as throughout the observation period under different treatments did not differ\r\nsignificantly. Final body weight and feed conversion ratio (FCR) reached in\r\n41 days of trial were 2542.5; 2568.9; 2610.5, 2516.6 g and 1.93; 1.81; 1.78; 1.88 kg for\r\nHS, probiotic, probiotic + HS and control group respectively. The best performance\r\nvariables including the European efficiency index (EEI) were observed in the probiotic\r\n+ HS group, where the effect of the probiotic supplementation was improved\r\nby HS. There were no significant differences among groups in the serum levels of\r\ntotal protein, glucose, cholesterol, aminotransferase and phosphorus. A significant\r\ndecrease of total lipids in the probiotic group (P E. faecium DSM 7134 had\r\nno significant effect on performance. However an improvement in FCR and EEI\r\nwas observed which is believed to be due to the significant increase of indices of\r\nmetabolic activity of phagocytes,caused by HS when combined with. <span class=\"bold\">E. faecium<\/span>\r\nDSM 7134.\r\n\r\n\r\n<br \/><br \/>\r\n<span class=\"bold\">Keywords:<\/span><br \/>\r\n\r\nprobiotic, natural humic substances, performance, serum biochemistry,\r\nmetabolic activity of phagocytes, lymphoproliferation, broiler chickens\r\n\r\n\r\n<br \/><br \/><br \/>\r\n\r\n<span class=\"bold\">Zusammenfassung<\/span><br \/>\r\n\r\nDiese Studie untersuchte Effekte des probiotischen Stammes <span class=\"bold\">Enterococcus (E.)\r\nfaecium<\/span> DSM 7134 (2 x 107<\/span> cfu\/g des Futtermittels) (Probiotikum-Gruppe),\r\nnat\u00fcrlicher humischer Substanzen (HS; 7g.kg-1<\/span> Futtermittel), sowie der Kombination\r\nbeider (Probiotikum + HS-Gruppe) auf Leistungsf\u00e4higkeit, biochemische\r\nParameter und die biologische Aktivit\u00e4t von Leukozyten bei Broilern. Die\r\ndurchschnittlichen K\u00f6rpermassen der Broiler in den einzelnen Untersuchungsruppen\r\nwaren weder in einzelnen noch \u00fcber die Gesamtphase hinweg signifikant\r\nunterschiedlich. Das Endgewicht und die Futtermittelkonversion (FCR) betrugen\r\nam 41. Tag des Versuchs 2542.5; 2568.9; 2610.5, 2516.6 g b 1.93; 1.81; 1.78; 1.88 kg\r\nin der HS-, Probiotikum-, Probiotikum+HS-, sowie Kontrollgruppe. Anhand der\r\nBestimmung des Europ\u00e4ischen Leistungsf\u00e4higkeits-Indexes (EEI) wiesen die\r\nTiere der Probiotikum+HS-Gruppe den h\u00f6chsten Index auf. Hingegen konnten keine signifikanten Unterschiede im Serumproteingehalt, Glukose, Cholesterol,\r\nAminotransferase und Phosphor zwischen den Gruppen gefunden werden. Der\r\nsignifikante Abfall des Gesamtfett-Gehalts in den Probiotikum- (P E. faecium DSM 7134\r\neinen signifikanten Effekt auf die Leistungsf\u00e4higkeit von H\u00fchnern haben, die\r\nKombination der beiden Futterzusatzstoffe aber eine Steigerung in FCR und EEI\r\nbewirken. Der positive Effekt der nat\u00fcrlichen humischen Substanzen f\u00fcr Probiotika\r\n(Probiotikum + HS) l\u00e4sst sich durch die signifikante Steigerung der metabolischen\r\nAktivit\u00e4t der Phagozyten erkl\u00e4ren.\r\n\r\n<br \/><br \/>\r\n<span class=\"bold\">Schl\u00fcsselw\u00f6rter:<\/span><br \/>\r\n\r\nProbiotika, nat\u00fcrliche humische Substanzen, Leistungsf\u00e4higkeit,\r\nBlutbiochemie, metabolische Aktivit\u00e4t der Phagozyten, Lymphoprolipheration,\r\nBroiler\r\n<\/p>","categories":["Tier\u00e4rztliche Wochenschrift","Abostufe BMTW","Fachartikel"],"fromDate":"Sep 10, 2009 12:00:00 AM","toDate":"Dec 31, 2050 12:00:00 AM","oldUrls":["http:\/\/vetline.de\/probiotic-natural-humic-substances-performance-serum-biochemistry\/150\/3130\/69158"],"doiLanguage":"englisch","doiProductFormat":"Online","doiPublisher":"Schl\u00fctersche Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG","doiSerialWorkTitle":"Berl. M\u00fcnch. Tier\u00e4rztl. Wschr.","doiDocumentUri":"http:\/\/www.vetline.de\/probiotic-natural-humic-substances-performance-serum-biochemistry\/150\/3130\/69158","doiSource":"Berl. M\u00fcnch. Tier\u00e4rztl. Wschr. 122: 9-10, 370-377 (2009)","doiissn":"0005-9366","doiNr":"10.2376\/0005-9366-122-370","doiFirstPage":"370","doiLastPage":"377","doiTransmitted":true,"doiAuthor":"Demeterov\u00e1 M, Mari\u009a\u00e8\u00e1kov\u00e1 R, Pistl J, Na\u00ef P, \u008aamudovsk\u00e1 A","pdf":{"path":"http:\/\/data\/bmtw_2009_09_0370.pdf","title":"bmtw_2009_09_0370.pdf","description":"The effect of the probiotic strain Enterococcus faecium DSM 7134 in combination with natural humic substances on performance and health of broiler chickens<br \/><br \/>"},"authors":[{"firstName":"M","middleName":"","lastName":"Demeterov\u00e1"},{"firstName":"R","middleName":"","lastName":"Mari\u009a\u00e8\u00e1kov\u00e1"},{"firstName":"J","middleName":"","lastName":"Pistl"},{"firstName":"P","middleName":"","lastName":"Na\u00ef"},{"firstName":"A","middleName":"","lastName":"\u008aamudovsk\u00e1"}],"contentOptimised":"<p><strong>Summary<\/strong><br>\n\n\nThe present study investigated the effect of the probiotic strain<strong> Enterococcus\nfaecium<\/strong> DSM 7134 (2 x 107 cfu per g of feed) (probiotic group), natural humic substances\n(7g.kg-1 feed) (HS group), and the combination of both (probiotic +\nHS group) on the performance, serum biochemistry, and biological activity of leucocytes\nof broiler chickens. Average body weight of chickens in different phases as\nwell as throughout the observation period under different treatments did not differ\nsignificantly. Final body weight and feed conversion ratio (FCR) reached in\n41 days of trial were 2542.5; 2568.9; 2610.5, 2516.6 g and 1.93; 1.81; 1.78; 1.88 kg for\nHS, probiotic, probiotic + HS and control group respectively. The best performance\nvariables including the European efficiency index (EEI) were observed in the probiotic\n+ HS group, where the effect of the probiotic supplementation was improved\nby HS. There were no significant differences among groups in the serum levels of\ntotal protein, glucose, cholesterol, aminotransferase and phosphorus. A significant\ndecrease of total lipids in the probiotic group (P E. faecium DSM 7134 had\nno significant effect on performance. However an improvement in FCR and EEI\nwas observed which is believed to be due to the significant increase of indices of\nmetabolic activity of phagocytes,caused by HS when combined with. <strong>E. faecium<\/strong>\nDSM 7134.\n\n\n<br><br>\n<strong>Keywords:<\/strong><br>\n\nprobiotic, natural humic substances, performance, serum biochemistry,\nmetabolic activity of phagocytes, lymphoproliferation, broiler chickens\n\n\n<br><br><br>\n\n<strong>Zusammenfassung<\/strong><br>\n\nDiese Studie untersuchte Effekte des probiotischen Stammes <strong>Enterococcus (E.)\nfaecium<\/strong> DSM 7134 (2 x 107 cfu\/g des Futtermittels) (Probiotikum-Gruppe),\nnat\u00fcrlicher humischer Substanzen (HS; 7g.kg-1 Futtermittel), sowie der Kombination\nbeider (Probiotikum + HS-Gruppe) auf Leistungsf\u00e4higkeit, biochemische\nParameter und die biologische Aktivit\u00e4t von Leukozyten bei Broilern. Die\ndurchschnittlichen K\u00f6rpermassen der Broiler in den einzelnen Untersuchungsruppen\nwaren weder in einzelnen noch \u00fcber die Gesamtphase hinweg signifikant\nunterschiedlich. Das Endgewicht und die Futtermittelkonversion (FCR) betrugen\nam 41. Tag des Versuchs 2542.5; 2568.9; 2610.5, 2516.6 g b 1.93; 1.81; 1.78; 1.88 kg\nin der HS-, Probiotikum-, Probiotikum+HS-, sowie Kontrollgruppe. Anhand der\nBestimmung des Europ\u00e4ischen Leistungsf\u00e4higkeits-Indexes (EEI) wiesen die\nTiere der Probiotikum+HS-Gruppe den h\u00f6chsten Index auf. Hingegen konnten keine signifikanten Unterschiede im Serumproteingehalt, Glukose, Cholesterol,\nAminotransferase und Phosphor zwischen den Gruppen gefunden werden. Der\nsignifikante Abfall des Gesamtfett-Gehalts in den Probiotikum- (P E. faecium DSM 7134\neinen signifikanten Effekt auf die Leistungsf\u00e4higkeit von H\u00fchnern haben, die\nKombination der beiden Futterzusatzstoffe aber eine Steigerung in FCR und EEI\nbewirken. Der positive Effekt der nat\u00fcrlichen humischen Substanzen f\u00fcr Probiotika\n(Probiotikum + HS) l\u00e4sst sich durch die signifikante Steigerung der metabolischen\nAktivit\u00e4t der Phagozyten erkl\u00e4ren.\n\n<br><br>\n<strong>Schl\u00fcsselw\u00f6rter:<\/strong><br>\n\nProbiotika, nat\u00fcrliche humische Substanzen, Leistungsf\u00e4higkeit,\nBlutbiochemie, metabolische Aktivit\u00e4t der Phagozyten, Lymphoprolipheration,\nBroiler\n<\/p>","primaryLanguage":"englisch","summary":"The present study investigated the effect of the probiotic strain<strong> Enterococcus\nfaecium<\/strong> DSM 7134 (2 x 107 cfu per g of feed) (probiotic group), natural humic substances\n(7g.kg-1 feed) (HS group), and the combination of both (probiotic +\nHS group) on the performance, serum biochemistry, and biological activity of leucocytes\nof broiler chickens. Average body weight of chickens in different phases as\nwell as throughout the observation period under different treatments did not differ\nsignificantly. Final body weight and feed conversion ratio (FCR) reached in\n41 days of trial were 2542.5; 2568.9; 2610.5, 2516.6 g and 1.93; 1.81; 1.78; 1.88 kg for\nHS, probiotic, probiotic + HS and control group respectively. The best performance\nvariables including the European efficiency index (EEI) were observed in the probiotic\n+ HS group, where the effect of the probiotic supplementation was improved\nby HS. There were no significant differences among groups in the serum levels of\ntotal protein, glucose, cholesterol, aminotransferase and phosphorus. A significant\ndecrease of total lipids in the probiotic group (P E. faecium DSM 7134 had\nno significant effect on performance. However an improvement in FCR and EEI\nwas observed which is believed to be due to the significant increase of indices of\nmetabolic activity of phagocytes,caused by HS when combined with. <strong>E. faecium<\/strong>\nDSM 7134.","keywords":["probiotic","natural humic substances","performance","serum biochemistry","\nmetabolic activity of phagocytes","lymphoproliferation","broiler chickens"],"zusammenfassung":"Diese Studie untersuchte Effekte des probiotischen Stammes <strong>Enterococcus (E.)\nfaecium<\/strong> DSM 7134 (2 x 107 cfu\/g des Futtermittels) (Probiotikum-Gruppe),\nnat\u00fcrlicher humischer Substanzen (HS; 7g.kg-1 Futtermittel), sowie der Kombination\nbeider (Probiotikum + HS-Gruppe) auf Leistungsf\u00e4higkeit, biochemische\nParameter und die biologische Aktivit\u00e4t von Leukozyten bei Broilern. Die\ndurchschnittlichen K\u00f6rpermassen der Broiler in den einzelnen Untersuchungsruppen\nwaren weder in einzelnen noch \u00fcber die Gesamtphase hinweg signifikant\nunterschiedlich. Das Endgewicht und die Futtermittelkonversion (FCR) betrugen\nam 41. Tag des Versuchs 2542.5; 2568.9; 2610.5, 2516.6 g b 1.93; 1.81; 1.78; 1.88 kg\nin der HS-, Probiotikum-, Probiotikum+HS-, sowie Kontrollgruppe. Anhand der\nBestimmung des Europ\u00e4ischen Leistungsf\u00e4higkeits-Indexes (EEI) wiesen die\nTiere der Probiotikum+HS-Gruppe den h\u00f6chsten Index auf. Hingegen konnten keine signifikanten Unterschiede im Serumproteingehalt, Glukose, Cholesterol,\nAminotransferase und Phosphor zwischen den Gruppen gefunden werden. Der\nsignifikante Abfall des Gesamtfett-Gehalts in den Probiotikum- (P E. faecium DSM 7134\neinen signifikanten Effekt auf die Leistungsf\u00e4higkeit von H\u00fchnern haben, die\nKombination der beiden Futterzusatzstoffe aber eine Steigerung in FCR und EEI\nbewirken. Der positive Effekt der nat\u00fcrlichen humischen Substanzen f\u00fcr Probiotika\n(Probiotikum + HS) l\u00e4sst sich durch die signifikante Steigerung der metabolischen\nAktivit\u00e4t der Phagozyten erkl\u00e4ren.","schluesselwoerter":["Probiotika","nat\u00fcrliche humische Substanzen","Leistungsf\u00e4higkeit","\nBlutbiochemie","metabolische Aktivit\u00e4t der Phagozyten","Lymphoprolipheration","\nBroiler"],"translatedTitle":"","abstractE":"The present study investigated the effect of the probiotic strain  Enterococcusfaecium  DSM 7134 (2 x 10 7  cfu per g of feed) (probiotic group), natural humic substances(7g.kg -1  feed) (HS group), and the combination of both (probiotic ...","date":{"year":2009,"date":"09\/2009","accepted":"2009-09-10"},"volume":"122","openAccess":false,"journal":"Berliner und M\u00fcnchener Tier\u00e4rztliche Wochenschrift","titleImageId":944,"pages":"370-377","redirects":["probiotic-natural-humic-substances-performance-serum-biochemistry\/150\/3130\/69158"],"tierartCategories":[],"artikelartCategories":["Tier\u00e4rztliche Wochenschrift","Abostufe BMTW","Fachartikel"]}
%8 09/2009